This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

V3 Gaming PC Avenger

 

v3 Gaming PC is a new boutique startup that was created by employees who previously worked at Vigor Gaming. V3 Gaming tells us they're working with

vidia on its 3D Vision compliance, and by the time you see this review, it's likely V3 Gaming wiLl be selling systems with 3D Vision Surround capabilities. At press time, V3 offered three systems: the Avenger, the Convoy, and me Crave-with me Avenger being the top-of-the- line model.

Our Avenger is certainly a luxury build, as it features two Zowc GeForce GTX 480s in SLl and a Zowc GeForce GTS 250 for dedicated PhysX processing. Other lavish hardware includes an Intel Core i7-980X running at 4GHz, two 80GB Inrel X-25M SSDs in RAID 0, 6GB ofDDR3-2000 RAM, and an Antec Twelve Hundred case with a black vinyl wrap that both proteas and adds to the look of me system. V3 Gaming points out that you can remove the vinyl wrap and paint the base chassis if you prefer to mod me exterior of the system.

We found that the darkness of the black vinyl exterior, which is nonreflective, en­hanced the appearance of the blue light­ing effects inside the case. There are blue LEDs in the three 120mm fans in the front of the case, me two 120mm rear exhaust fans, and the 200mm fan at me top of the case. The mass of lights created a dim blue haze over the syscem interior, Cable routing was smartly done, and we like mat me builder covered some of me brighdy colored cables with electrical tape .

V3 Gaming performs both me over­clocking and RAID setup as a free ser­vice. The Avenger sent to us featured an Asus PGX58D-E motherboard with a GGbps SATA interface, and with the Intel

X-25M RAID 0 setup, me sys­tem was able to deliver a 308.4GMbps transfer speed in me Physical Disks test of SiSorrware Sandra 20 I 0 Lice. The Avenger was a strong gaming PC, with 81. 7 fps in Dir 2, 10G.97fps in Far Cry 2, and 42.4fps in STAL.K.E.R.: Call OfPripyar.

Our only qualm with the Avenger was the amount of heat coming from the graphics cards. We would have expect­ed a fan on the side panel near the graphics card, but V3 Gaming opted not to use one. And when we put our hand on the Avenger's side panel, we could feel that the whole side panel was warm. That being said, we didn't experience any overheating issues during our benchmarking or burn-in tests, and V3 Gaming backs every sys­tem with a three-year warranty.

Performance of me Avenger was top­notch, and we like that V3 Gaming offers overclocking free, a practice mat some boutique builders have gone away from. We also expect that V3 Gaming wiLl offer a wider variety of systems in the near future

HP buys Palm

 

 

HP, one of the largest computer manufacturers in the world, has bought smartphone manufacturer Palm for $1.2 billion (around £800 million), paying £3.80 per share. The transaction has been approved by the boards of directors at HP and Palm and is expected to close by 31st July, pending shareholder and regulatory approval The deal will also see HP inherit Palm's estimated £270 million of debt, which will be paid off using Palm's cash assets.

Rumours surrounding the struggling smartphone maker were swirling long before HP formally announced the acquisition. In fact, ever since the Palm Pre smartphone received a lukewarm market reception, industry pundits have said it was a target for acquisition. Reports suggested the company was working with Goldman Sachs to find a buyer.

The firm's critically acclaimed WebOS mobile operating system was seen as Palm's prized asset and heavily influenced HP's decision to go ahead with the acquisition. HP said the combination of its "global scale and financial strength" with Palm's webOS platform "will enhance HP's ability to participate more aggressively" in the smartphone and connected mobile device markets.

HP is no stranger to the smartphone market, having produced a variety of Windows Mobile-based iPaq smartphones for business users, which weren't particularly successful While the deal provides a lifeline for Palm, it remains to be seen whether HP can take two fairly unsuccessful smartphone business units and reinvigorate both companies' offerings, enabling them to compete on a global scale.

The major competition for HP and Palm will come from Apple's hugely successful iPhone and the rise in popularity of handsets based on Google's Android operating system. Both are relative newcomers, so it will be interesting to see how Palm manages to compete with HP's backing.

Brian Humphries, senior vice­president of strategy and corporate development at HP, said HP plans to "double down on webOS" and intend to "scale it across multiple connected devices". Palm chairman and CEO Jon Rubinstein said he was "thrilled by HP's vote of confidence in Palm's technological leadership" and said the computer manufacturer was "the perfect partner to rapidly accelerate the growth of web OS".

During the conference call following the acquisition's announcement, Todd Bradley, executive vice-president of HP's Personal Systems Group and the man tasked with overseeing Palm's integration into HP,

There have been suggestions that HP will drop Windows 7 from the HP Slate, a Tablet PC unveiled by Microsoft's Steve Ballmer earlier this year, in favour of webOS. A report on TechCrunch.com claimed that the decision had already been made because of disappointment with the performance and usability of Windows 7 in a touchscreen-only environment.

These suggestions haven't been confirmed by HP, however, and it's not even clear if the HP Slate is still coming to market. However, it's unlikely that HP would release the Slate with webOS instead of Windows 7, as the two platforms have such widely different hardware requirements.

HP chief executive Mark Hurd later announced that webOS would be making its way to both slate form factor devices and - somewhat bizarrely - web­connected printers soon after the deal has been closed, but didn't mention the Slate's fate.

The move to webOS on the company's Tablet devices would, in many ways, make good sense: one of the major reasons Apple's rival iPad slate has proved so popular is because of its custom-built streamlined operating system. For every user who bemoans at its limitations there are 10 who are happy that it is fast, attractive and just works.

In contrast, HP's original decision to use Windows 7 would result in a more flexible - but more complicated - device. Of course, if H P can afford to develop two different slate platforms, there's no harm in that. Windows-based tablet PCs haven't enjoyed much success in the past, though, and, even with Windows 7's specific touchscreen optimisations, it's still an operating system primarily designed for keyboard and mouse inputs. Palm was one of the earliest smartphone manufacturers and has one of the most complex corporate histories ever. Palm originally created the Palm Pilot PDA and was acquired by US Robotics in 1995. US Robotics was bought by 3Com in 1997 and spun Palm off as its own entity in 2000. Palm then split itself in two:

PalmOne became the handset manufacturer, while Palm Source was responsible for maintaining the operating system.

To further complicate matters, several key members of the Palm board of directors left in 1998 to set up Handspring, a Palm OS PDA manufacturer. Handspring was purchased by PalmOne in 2003 and then, in May 2005, PalmOne bought all the rights to the Palm name and once again became Palm. In recent times, the company has struggled against rivals such as Apple, HTC and BlackBerry manufacturer

Research in Motion.